A Warped Idea of Fairness

 What's Your Opinion?

Maine’s 3,000 non-union state employees ought to march en masse to the office of Governor John Baldacci and ask him to explain exactly what is fair about “fair share.” Tucked away in the $5.8-billion state budget bill passed by Democrats last month was a wage contract requiring, for the first time, that all non-union state employees pay union dues as a condition of continued employment.

They call it “fair share” though it is anything but fair. Two years ago, coinciding with Baldacci’s inauguration, state negotiators caved in to the Maine State Employees Association and agreed that all new hires from that point on — union members and non-members alike — would be required to pay “fair share” dues to the MSEA to cover the cost of contract negotiations. That never should have happened. Now, thanks to the Governor and Legislature, that provision has been broadened to include not just new hires but all employees, providing an annual windfall of about $700,000 to the MSEA. 

The MSEA’s argument, and that of the Governor, is that the union is negotiating contracts for all those individuals who choose, whether on principle or for other reasons, not to join. Hence, they should be required to provide financial support. The truth is that many of those non-union members would be more than happy to fend for themselves, were they allowed to do so. But they’re not. The further truth is that the cost of the negotiating process doesn’t rise or fall depending upon the number of union members. The union doesn’t negotiate for Joe Smith or Tom Jones as individuals; it bargains wages and benefits for positions and classes of employees.

But Baldacci never met a union he did not like, and he clearly has no qualms about forcing non-union members to pay tribute to the MSEA or give up their jobs. For full-time workers that now means monthly dues of $9.10 if you belong to the union and $6.71 if you don’t. But either way, you pay. The Governor has turned state government into what is commonly known as a “closed shop.”

It would be gratifying to see outraged legislators rise up and act to repeal the so-called “fair share” provision. Unions ought to succeed or fail based solely on their appeal to prospective members. Government — and by extension that is all of us — should not be demanding that its employees join or otherwise support the MSEA or any other such organization. There’s nothing fair about threatening an individual with the loss of his livelihood to force him to conform.

What's your opinion? Write to our editors, click here.

   
   

This site and all contents therein are the exclusive property of Ellsworth American, Inc. 
Reproduction without permission is strictly forbidden, for more information contact info@ellsworthamerican.com